The cognitive crisis in modern humans, highlights the destruction of life and the forgotten art of knowledge creation. My paper will explore how the paradigm of modernity, is based on the delusionary system created by cognitively ‘rewired’ people. The literate cognitive system and the indigenous system represent distinct ways of processing information, perceiving the world, and organizing knowledge. Some key differences are: 1. The indigenous cognitive system is often rooted in oral tradition. In contrast, the literate cognitive system relies heavily on written language, formal education, and the use of texts for learning and communication. 2. Indigenous cognitive systems emphasize holistic thinking, viewing the world as interconnected and integrated. In contrast, the literate cognitive system promotes analytical thinking, breaking down complex concepts into discrete components for analysis and understanding. 3. Indigenous cognitive systems have unique spatial and temporal orientations, influenced by cultural beliefs, seasonal cycles, and geographical landscapes. This can include a deep connection to land, ancestral knowledge of natural resources, and cyclical views of time. In contrast, the literate cognitive system tends to have a linear, chronological view of time and may prioritize abstract concepts over specific spatial orientations. 4. The epistemological foundations of indigenous cognitive systems are often based on experiential learning, intuition, and communal wisdom passed down through generations. In contrast, the literate cognitive system is rooted in formalized education, empirical evidence, and the validation of knowledge through scientific methods and academic institutions. 5. Indigenous cognitive systems encompass a diversity of perspectives, beliefs, and cultural practices specific to different indigenous communities around the world. In contrast, the literate cognitive system may promote more standardized, universalized knowledge that is accessible across different cultural contexts. Understanding and appreciating these differences can lead to greater cross-cultural understanding, collaboration, and the integration of diverse knowledge systems in addressing complex global challenges.