RoundTable
Whose Side are We on? Voices and Statements emanating from Anthropologists, to the World Community.
moderators
Michel Bouchard
Nationality: Canada
Residence: Canada
Presence:Online
Subhadra Channa
Nationality: India
Residence: India
Delhi University
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
discussants
Subhadra Channa
Nationality: India
Residence: India
Delhi University
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Sachiko Kubota
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Virginia R. Dominguez
Nationality: USA
Residence: USA
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Andrew ‘Mugsy’ Spiegel
Nationality: South Africa
Residence: South Africa
University of Cape Town
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Gordon Mathews
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Carmel Rial
Presence:Face to Face/ On Site
Keywords:
Activism, Statements, WAU EC, Protest
Abstract:
Anthropology has always been a discipline keenly involved in the affairs of the world, especially those that involve and also affect the marginal, the dominated and the political victims of violence and oppression. As a deeply humanistic subject whose main methodological tool involves empathy and intersubjective understanding, anthropologists are inevitably drawn emotionally and ethically into situations that involve injustice and aggression. As a body representative of the anthropological communities globally, the World Anthropological Union, carries the moral burden of speaking up for causes that involve violation of humanity, disregard for human lives and security and overall crimes that involve the collective, especially states and power centers. However, as social scientists, anthropologists also recognize the complexity of social and political situations, the precariousness of a situation of ‘taking sides’, as for example in the ongoing violence in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and other places around the world. Each statement that is issued is weighed and judged and many a times the decision may be taken to opt for silence. There may be a sense of futility, ‘Do we speak at all?’, ‘Will anything change?’; and so on. As anthropologists, we have the overall ethics of speaking up for the victim, the oppressed and the marginal; but in many situations the identity of the victim may not be clear cut or obfuscated by political stands taken. In the ongoing conflict in Gaza for example, while sympathy is pouring in for Palestinians, there is hardly anyone to support the civilian hostages taken by Hamas. As anthropologists it therefore becomes imperative for us to be sensitive and impartial, taking a holistic and unbiased perspective as far as possible. It is important that we remain scholars and critical thinkers weighing and analyzing all the data, careful not to succumb to confirmation bias.
This roundtable will debate around some of the issues that are involved when anthropological bodies make statements and take a political stand with respect to any issue.